Complainant alleges that an officer did not intervene when they were being physically assaulted The Office of Police Oversight recommends that this allegation receive a B classification.
Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
NOTICE OF FORMAL
ICMS #: 2020-1751
December 30, 2020
Complaint: The Complainant alleges: an APD officer did not intervene when complainant was
seeking a peaceful resolution from a physical attacker and a verbal attacker. He is representing
himself as a public law enforcement officer when he’s not he is an Apple store employee with a
gun and a badge.”
This notice of formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation in
order to determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service
Rules, and Municipal Civil Service Rules.
Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to):
301.2 IMPARTIAL ATTITUDE AND COURTESY
Employees shall provide equal and fair protection of all rights under local, state, and federal law
for all members of the community. Law enforcement will be conducted in an impartial and
303.3 DEPARTMENT ISSUED BODY WORN CAMERA BWC equipment is to be used
primarily by uniformed personnel as authorized per assignment by the Department and must be
used unless otherwise authorized by a Commander or above.
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation
on the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO recommends that this allegation receive a B classification.