The complainant alleges that Austin Police Department Interim Police Chief Joe Chacon and Assistant Chief of Police Richard Guajardo improperly pressured a detective to stop communicating with defense attorneys related to a high-profile case. Assistant Chief Guajardo allegedly threatened the detective with an internal affairs investigation after the detective shared an affidavit alleging misconduct by the district attorney with the defense attorneys. OPO recommends an independent investigation into the actions of Assistant Chief Guajardo, Interim Chief Chacon, and the detective.
PDF Content
Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.
NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to
communications will be provided upon request.
In ordering Assistant Chief Guajardo to silence Detective
Interim Chief Chacon
committed (at a minimum) the following criminal offenses:
- Tampering with a Witness (Texas Penal Code Section 36.05)
- Obstruction or Retaliation (Texas Penal Code Section 36.06)
- Official Oppression (Texas Penal Code Section 39.03)
- Abuse of Official Capacity (Texas Penal Code Section 39.02)
- Coercion of a Public Servant (Texas Penal Code Section 36.03)
In addition to criminal law violations, Interim Chief Guajardo violated multiple APD Policies.
In threatening Detective
with an internal affairs case and ordering to never again speak
with the defense attorneys again, Guajardo committed (at a minimum) the following criminal
offenses:
- Tampering with a Witness (Texas Penal Code Section 36.05)
- Obstruction or Retaliation (Texas Penal Code Section 36.06)
- Official Oppression (Texas Penal Code Section 39.03)
- Abuse of Official Capacity (Texas Penal Code Section 39.02)
- Coercion of a Public Servant (Texas Penal Code Section 36.03)
In addition to criminal law violations, Assistant Chief Guajardo violated multiple APD Policies.
Administrative Policies to Review:
The OPO recommends an independent investigation into the actions of Assistant Chief Guajardo,
Interim Chief Chacon and Detective
301.2 Impartial Attitude and Courtesy
Employees are expected to act professionally, treat all persons fairly and equally, and perform all
duties impartially, objectively, and equitable without regard to personal feelings, animosities,
friendships, financial status, sex, creed, color, race, religion, age, political beliefs, sexual
orientation, gender identity or gender expression or social or ethnic background.
(a) Employees will not express or otherwise manifest any prejudice concerning race, religion,
national origin, age, political affiliation, sex, or other personal characteristics in the
performance of their duties.
1. Employees will respect the rights of individuals and will not engage in
discrimination, oppression, or favoritism whether by language, act, or omission.
NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to
communications will be provided upon request.
900.4.3 Neglect of Duty
Employees will satisfactorily perform their duties. Examples of unsatisfactory performance
include, but are not limited to: (a) Lack of knowledge of the application of laws required to be
enforced. (b) Unwillingness or inability to perform assigned tasks. (c) Failure to take appropriate
action on the occasion of a crime, disorder, investigation or other condition deserving police
attention. (d) Failure to respond to any call or to perform any police duties assigned to them by
appropriate authorities.
900.3.2 Acts Bringing Discredit Upon the Department
Since the conduct of personnel both on-duty or off-duty may reflect directly upon the Department,
employees must conduct themselves at all times in a manner which does not bring reproach,
discredit, or embarrassment to the Department or to the City.
(a) Employees will not commit any act which tends to destroy public confidence in, and
respect for, the Department or which is prejudicial to the good order, efficiency, or
discipline of the Department.
900.1.1 Responsibility to Know and Comply
The rules of conduct set forth in this order do not serve as an all-inclusive list of requirements,
limitations, or prohibitions on employee conduct and activities; employees are required to know
and comply with all Department policies, procedures, and written directives.
(a) Employees will maintain a working knowledge and comply with the laws, ordinances,
statutes, regulations, and APD directives which pertain to their assigned duties.
(b) Employees who do not understand their assigned duties or responsibilities will read the
relevant directives and guidelines and will consult their immediate supervisor for
clarification and explanation.
(c) A lack of knowledge of an APD written directive is not a defense to disciplinary action.
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation on
the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO is not recommending a classification. The OPO is recommending an independent
investigation into the actions of Assistant Chief Guajardo, Interim Chief Chacon and Detective
.