August 12, 2020

Formal Complaint: Responsibility to Know and Comply, Retaliation Prohibited, Honesty, and other policy violations

Complainant alleges that an Austin police lieutenant gave an order to falsify timesheets. The Office of Police Oversight recommends that this allegation receive am A classification.

PDF Content

Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.

The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT ICMS #: 2020-1350 August 12, 2020 Complaint: The Office of Police Oversight is the complainant. This complaint is related to ICMS #: 2020-1282. Lieutenant may have given an illegal order to falsify time sheets. This order may have been followed by Sergeant and Sergeant . This notice of formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation in order to determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service Rules, and Municipal Civil Service Rules. Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to): 900.3.1 HONESTY Honesty is of the utmost importance in the police profession. Employees are expected to be truthful at all times in the performance of their duties. 900.1.1 RESPONSIBILITY TO KNOW AND COMPLY The rules of conduct set forth in this order do not serve as an all-inclusive list of requirements, limitations, or prohibitions on employee conduct and activities; employees are required to know and comply with all Department policies, procedures, and written directives. Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation on the classification of administrative cases. The OPO recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.
feedback

Did you find what you were looking for on this page?