The complainant alleges that Austin police officers misidentified them, causing financial hardship.
Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT
January 14, 2022
ICMS #: 2022-0035
On January 13, 2022 the OPO received an online complaint.
The complainant alleges: On
was served a civil suit
relating to Case ID
- Report completed by
. After a
call to 311 to open a case of Identity Theft, we were referred to our local agency -
. It was determined that the APD Officer mis-identified the
and listed my wife
as the driver to unit 1. This error has caused financial damages for increased insurance rates as
well as attorney costs to defend against the law suit due to this Officer’s error. Upon calling back
to 311 via the Oversight return call - APD did call and stated that
was not listed on the report
but could not provide me a copy and referred me to a records department.
Horrible service from APD and when searching the data base, the report still identifies
This notice of complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation to determine
if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service Rules, and Municipal
Civil Service Rules.