4 de noviembre de 2019

Queja formal: Inventario de vehículos y otras violaciones a políticas

El querellante alega que el Departamento de Policía de Austin (APD) no tenía derecho a incautar su vehículo. Además, un oficial puede haber violado las políticas al no haber incluido los resultados del inventario en el Informe de grúa/incautación de APD. OPO recomienda que esta alegación reciba una clasificación B.

Contenido del documento

Aviso: El siguiente texto fue extraído de un documento PDF para hacerlo más accesible. Este contenido generado por máquina puede contener errores de formato. El texto se mostrará en el idioma original del documento. En algunos casos, el texto no se cargará si el documento original es una imagen escaneada o si el texto no tiene capacidad de búsqueda. Para mirar la versión completa, favor de ver el documento PDF.

NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT ICMS: 2019-0856 November 4, 2019 Date of Complaint: 08/20/2019 Complaint: Per the Internal Affairs Complaint Contact Form, the complainant, , alleged that the Austin Police Department did not have the right to impound his vehicle. Additional Information: The OPO conducted a preliminary review of the available information regarding this complaint. Officer appeared to complete the inventory of Mr. vehicle and Officer appeared to complete the APD Wrecker/Impound Report. The OPO has determined that Officer may have violated APD policy when he appeared to not include the results of the inventory in the APD Wrecker/Impound Report. Administrative Policies to Review: 350.4 Vehicle Inventory (a) In all incidents where a vehicle is impounded or moved, officers will make an inventory of the vehicle for damage and any items of personal property. Such an inventory is a car taking function intended to protect: 1. The owner’s property while it remains in police custody. 2. The police against claims or disputes over lost or stolen property. (b) The scope of the inventory will include: 1. The exterior for body damage. 2. Those places in a vehicle where a person ordinarily would store or leave items of personal property. Those areas can be but are not limited to: (a) Passenger compartment. (b) Trunk, console, glove box, an attached locked containers (e.g., toolbox) if the key is readily available. (c) Open and closed containers. 3. The inventory will include contents of locked containers (e.g., briefcase, footlockers) if the key or combination is readily available. If the key is unavailable, containers/compartments may be opened with supervisor’s approval. (c) All vehicle damage and personal property located during an inventory of a vehicle will be listed on the APD Wrecker/Impound Report, including its description and location. 900.1.1 Responsibility to Know and Comply The rules of conduct set forth in this order do not serve as an all-inclusive list of requirements, limitations, or prohibitions on employee conduct and activities; employees are required to know and comply with all Department policies, procedures, and written directives. (a) Employees will maintain a working knowledge and comply with the laws, ordinances, statutes, regulations, and APD directives which pertain to their assigned duties. NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT (b) Employees who do not understand their assigned duties or responsibilities will read the relevant directives and guidelines, and will consult their immediate supervisor for clarification and explanation. (c) A lack of knowledge of an APD written directive is not a defense to disciplinary action. Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation on the classification of administrative cases. The OPO recommends that this allegation receive a B classification.
feedback

¿Encontró lo que estaba buscando en esta página?